Quantum mechanics is the science of the very small: the body of scientific principles that explains the behaviour of matter and its interactions with energy on the scale of atoms and subatomic particles. Researchers from University of Toronto decided to take a deeper look at particles at the quantum level.New research demonstrates that particles at the quantum level can in fact be seen as behaving something like billiard balls rolling along a table, and not merely as the probabilistic smears that the standard interpretation of quantum mechanics suggests. But there's a catch - the tracks the particles follow do not always behave as one would expect from realistic trajectories, but often in a fashion that has been termed surrealistic.
In a new version of an old experiment, CIFAR, Canadian Institute For Advanced Research Senior Fellow Aephraim Steinberg (University of Toronto) and colleagues, tracked the trajectories of photons as the particles traced a path through one of two slits and onto a screen. But the researchers went further, and observed the nonlocal influence of another photon that the first photon had been entangled with.The results counter a long-standing criticism of an interpretation of quantum mechanics called the De Broglie-Bohm theory. Detractors of this interpretation had faulted it for failing to explain the behaviour of entangled photons realistically. For Steinberg, the results are important because they give us a way of visualizing quantum mechanics that's just as valid as the standard interpretation, and perhaps more intuitive.
At stake is what is really happening at the quantum level. The uncertainty principle tells us that we can never know both a particle's position and momentum with complete certainty. And when we do interact with a quantum system, for instance by measuring it, we disturb the system. So if we fire a photon at a screen and want to know where it will hit, we'll never know for sure exactly where it will hit or what path it will take to get there.The standard interpretation of quantum mechanics holds that this uncertainty means that there is no real trajectory between the light source and the screen. The best we can do is to calculate a wave function that shows the odds of the photon being in any one place at any time, but won't tell us where it is until we make a measurement.
Yet another interpretation, called the De Broglie-Bohm theory, says that the photons do have real trajectories that are guided by a pilot wave that accompanies the particle. The wave is still probabilistic, but the particle takes a real trajectory from source to target. It doesn't simply collapse into a particular location once it's measured.Bohmian mechanics, which is also called the de Broglie-Bohm theory, the pilot-wave model, and the causal interpretation of quantum mechanics, is a version of quantum theory discovered by Louis de Broglie in 1927 and rediscovered by David Bohm in 1952. It is the simplest example of what is often called a hidden variables interpretation of quantum mechanics.
Critics had pointed out a problem with the 2011 Steinberg and his colleagues experiment. Quantum mechanics also tells us that two particles can be entangled, so that a measurement of one particle affects the other. The critics complained that in some cases, a measurement of one particle would lead to an incorrect prediction of the trajectory of the entangled particle. They coined the term surreal trajectories to describe them.In the most recent experiment, Steinberg and colleagues showed that the surrealism was a consequence of non-locality - the fact that the particles were able to influence one another instantaneously at a distance.
In fact, the incorrect predictions of trajectories by the entangled photon were actually a consequence of where in their course the entangled particles were measured. Considering both particles together, the measurements made sense and were consistent with real trajectories.Steinberg points out that both the standard interpretation of quantum mechanics and the De Broglie-Bohm interpretation are consistent with experimental evidence, and are mathematically equivalent. But it is helpful in some circumstances to visualize real trajectories, rather than wave function collapses, he says.